Imagine you are attending a
high-performing school; your school has high standardized test
scores, high graduation rates, with a large percentage of graduates
matriculating into college. Or imagine you are attending an
under-performing school with low test scores and poor graduation
rates. Or even imagine you are attending a mediocre school with
mediocre results. In any case the adoption of the common core
standards will not help you.
If you are in a high-performing school
then you are already doing well and the common core will not help
you. Your school is already graduating students and sending them to
college.
If you are in an under-performing
school then you are not meeting the current standards, you and your
peers are behind grade level and the drop out rate is high. New
standards will not help you.
If you are in a mediocre school then
some of your students are doing well and some are doing poorly and
neither the students who are doing well nor the students who are
doing poorly would pretend to imagine that their success or failure
is a result of standards adopted by the state.
Yet, bureaucrats, pundits, and
bloggers, imagine that they can improve your school by adopting the
common core standards. Teachers, administrators, parents, and
students spend their days teaching, learning, and interacting in the
schools. If their success could be enhanced and their failures could
be succored by such standards why would they not have already
implemented such standards in the district, building, classroom, and
household?
The answer is simple, standards are not
the problem. Students do not drop out of school because the standards
adopted by the state are hazy. Students do not struggle to read,
write, or learn arithmetic because the state has not properly
articulated defined notions of reading, writing, and arithmetic.
While the reasons why students drop out or fail to excel in academic
endeavors are varied it is seldom, if ever, a result of standards.
Students drop out because they do drugs
or have become pregnant. They may suffer from a learning disability
or have experienced childhood trauma which adversely affects their
education. Crime, transportation, and poverty are often causes for
poor performance in school. Conversely students who do well come from
parents of higher socioeconomic status. They have parents who care
about them and support them. They are healthy and have had
opportunities to develop physically, socially, and academically.
You cannot legislate educational
success. Students' success is a result of their own actions, which
are aided by parents and teachers. Students who do well are motivated
and supported by those around them. Students who fail are unmotivated
and/or hampered by poverty, trauma, and drugs. Much of the current
discussion around the common core would be better spent on examining
the historical and material successes and failures of our education
system.
Amen to that.
ReplyDeleteGet fucked
ReplyDelete