This quote by the ancient blind Greek poet Homer seems to have been lost in the contemporary United States over violence. It makes a nice sloganesque response to the tired line "guns don't kill people, people kill people." So, after Trayvon Martin and Bo Morrisson were murdered by gun-wielding people, this picture started making its rounds.
No, but two did.
If justifiable homicide claims have tripled in florida then the odds that some of these (admittedly arbitrary) number HAVE killed someone in the last year.
If we update Homer's quote to "The Gun Itself Incites To Violence" it becomes more relevant today. Yes, as George Carlin once said "you could probably beat a guy to death with the Sunday New York Times" but that would be a lot more work than pulling a trigger, and much less likely to happen accidentally.
The truth is, yes a gun is a tool. But it is a tool with just one use.
I am speaking as a former Army Tanker who has shot bigger guns than most civilian gun enthusiasts.
Excuse me, "weapons." There is little hope of instilling any feeling of empathy for gunshot victims in those civilians, other than for each other's phallic symbols.
Another "truth," "responsible gun owner." This is not a binary condition. I am a responsible driver, but every once in a while I make a mistake. Even "gangbangers" in the ghetto manage not to shoot their balls off most of the time. Are they responsible gun owners? Oh, you mean, white people who are around guns and have taken classes. Okay. But familiarity breeds complacence. I was around guns all the time in the army and took classes. So it wasn't an uncomfortable experience. But when I saw a guy at the movies putting on his coat a little while back to cover the 9mm on his belt, I freaked. In the army weapons were a tool of the trade, at the movies, a gun is... what exactly? Did this fellow think he was gonna get in a shootout in Mequon (one of the richest, safest suburbs in WI)? Or was it because he was black in a pretty white place?
Ahhh, there it is. And no, I saw the gun first because I was waiting on a bench outside the theater. Seeing a gun carried by anyone is enough to make me anxious, it is just something that is out of place in civilian life. I am not going to rattle off any cliches about why creeps might want to carry a concealed (or not so concealed) weapon in public, but am I going to have to feel this anxious everytime I step out of my door from now on?
"The Gun Itself Incites To Violence" I can cause you harm if I choose. All other concerns seem secondary and I do not want to save a society that thinks this is moral or ethical, and especially if it is legal.
So what exactly is the point that you are making. Suppose everyone in this country had a gun, would the country be improved by telling everyone that they should destroy their gun because it incites itself to violence? Do you suppose that those most inclined to fire their guns would throw them into the fire? Would not the most moral men be the men unarmed? Let us not forget how Mussolini came to power. All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
ReplyDeleteI find your false dilemma fallacy unconvincing. If you are so hot to shoot people, join the army. They have all the guns you could ever want.
ReplyDeleteCould you tell me where exactly that quote is from?
ReplyDeleteHey there! I was thrilled when I opened this web page of your portal. What was the main reason at that moment when you took a decision to build your website?
ReplyDeleteThere are various translations of that quote from Homer. A more apt one in this instance might be "iron by itself
ReplyDeletecan draw a man to use it."